Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct.
Google and other search engines do give you the choices of strict, moderate, to no filters at all in the settings.
The definition of that term is that the recipient of the act doesn't want it.
And while morality and virtue crumble to dust around them, they'll still be sneering at a truth so profound they won't beleive it: 'Abstinance works - every time it's tried.
Federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation.
Description: Under which country's laws would it filter?