Can we perhaps work on revamping this article a bit? Even if the kids are anime, it still seems if the said kid is under the , it should be classified as child pornography...
There is a task force.
When I read the Lolicon article, it seems clear from the opening that it is not only literary but also a personal characteristic.
To whom would it be offensive? From digitally modeled objects to carefully painted and shaded drawings that feature detailed realism, 3D art transports viewers into new worlds and scenes.
The reference directly supports the statement.
Description: This article actually covers many things regarding the term lolicon, which has a rather complex meaning depending on what your taking about.